Categories RPG

Brigandine Abyss Review: A Grand Strategy SRPG That Stumbles in Its Ambitions

The original Brigandine on the PlayStation carved out a distinctive niche in the crowded tactical RPG landscape of the late 1990s by offering something its contemporaries lacked: a macro-level strategic layer that elevated the experience beyond simple battle-to-battle progression. While games like Final Fantasy Tactics and Vandal Hearts focused primarily on individual skirmishes, Brigandine drew inspiration from PC strategy titles, tasking players with conquering territories across a sprawling continental map while incorporating detailed preparation phases before each tactical engagement. This fusion of free-form map conquest and hex-grid turn-based combat attracted a dedicated following, even if it remained firmly in cult classic territory. Two decades later, publisher Happinet surprised longtime fans with Brigandine: The Legend of Runersia on Switch and PlayStation 4, proving the franchise still had life. Now, with development duties shifting to Adglobe—the studio behind the acclaimed Ender Lilies and Ender Magnolia—Brigandine Abyss arrives with both promise and significant growing pains.

Brigandine Abyss maintains the core grand strategy and tactical battle fusion that defined its predecessors, yet struggles considerably in its presentation and heightened storytelling ambitions. The game attempts to streamline what has traditionally been a hardcore franchise for broader appeal, but in doing so, sacrifices mechanical and narrative depth that made the series special. Set on the continent of Meltitea, the story begins when the Kingdom of Solginat falls to the machinations of the king’s scheming advisor, who has been corrupted by a dark force known as Abyss. The resulting Abyssloa Empire launches a continental conquest, and players choose between six factions to resist this tide of darkness. Each faction offers unique starting positions, characters, and motivations—from the Scarlet Will mercenary band protecting a displaced princess to the eccentric scientists of Pandemyuon experimenting on humans, to Gran Dragnica’s dragon tamers seeking vengeance for their mistreated kin.

A Unique Seasonal Campaign Structure

What distinguishes Brigandine Abyss from most strategy RPGs is its seasonal campaign structure, which bears more resemblance to grand strategy titles like Koei’s Nobunaga’s Ambition or Sid Meier’s Civilization series than traditional SRPGs. Each season divides into three distinct phases: Organization, Attack, and Invasion. The Organization Phase consumes the bulk of playtime, as players prepare units for combat, undertake quests for materials, and purchase items from merchants. The Attack Phase is brief, involving declarations of war against neighboring territories while observing rival faction movements. Finally, the Invasion Phase brings the actual turn-based tactical combat as players invade enemy territory or defend against incursions. This structure creates a compelling strategic layer that requires careful attention to map dynamics and rival nation progressions. Players must thoughtfully expand holdings to claim valuable resources while maintaining adequate defenses across ever-growing territories.

The strategic depth embedded in the Organization Phase proves genuinely engaging. Assigning monster retinues to human leaders, planning troop movements, and developing conquered territories or newly recruited soldiers provides hours of satisfying management gameplay. However, the system lacks diplomatic options entirely—no alliances, trade agreements, or negotiations exist, leaving military conquest as the sole means of faction interaction. This limitation feels particularly stark given the sophisticated grand strategy games that clearly inspired the design. Historical strategy titles have long understood that diplomacy adds crucial variety and strategic depth, making its absence here a notable shortcoming that constrains player agency.

Narrative Ambitions Undermined by Structure

Unfortunately, the open-ended seasonal structure fundamentally undermines Brigandine Abyss’s storytelling aspirations. Most narrative content unfolds through Event Battles—essentially story missions—that trigger after arbitrary numbers of seasons pass, typically between ten and twenty. These events completely ignore the actual state of the map, creating jarring disconnects between gameplay progress and narrative stakes. After twenty seasons of aggressive expansion and territorial domination, the story might still treat your faction as an underdog scraping by against impossible odds. A single season can last over an hour depending on territorial holdings and battle frequency, meaning dozens of hours might pass between meaningful story beats. The handful of cutscenes attempting to heighten drama are few, cheaply animated as little more than motion stills, and fail to generate emotional investment.

Presentational issues extend beyond narrative pacing to visual design itself. Character artwork represents a significant step down from Legend of Runersia’s evocative fantasy designs by Raita Kazama. Abyss’s character portraits and monster designs feel like a hodgepodge of generic modern fantasy anime clichés rather than establishing a unique visual identity. Most leader characters lack personalized battlefield models, instead using generic class-based appearances—only faction leaders receive unique on-field representations. Given the diversity in character portraits, this represents an enormous missed opportunity for visual storytelling during combat. Composer Rei Kondoh, known for Fire Emblem: Three Houses, provides one consistent bright spot with an appropriately epic and bombastic musical soundscape befitting the continental conflict.

Combat Mechanics: Serviceable but Repetitive

The core combat mechanics function adequately but lack the depth found in the organizational phase while suffering from similar pacing problems. Battles occur on large hexagonal grid maps, with each side deploying three leader units accompanied by up to six monster companions apiece. Leaders possess command scores determining how many monsters they can field, with costs varying by creature strength. Early game leaders manage only two or three weak monsters, but leveling increases command capacity and retinue potential. The system encourages thoughtful unit composition, as each monster and leader class fills distinct roles across roughly twenty unique classes with specialized abilities. Leaders can Rally a monster to their side, removing it from battle in exchange for powerful passive bonuses like increased movement range or enhanced counterattacks. This ensures even weaker creatures contribute meaningfully if they confer useful bonuses.

However, campaign success requires fighting battle after repetitive battle during Invasion Phases, especially as territorial holdings expand. During single seasons, players might face four or five consecutive battles sharing identical victory conditions—defeat all enemies when invading, or survive twelve turns when defending. Maps are large and relatively empty, requiring multiple turns just to reach enemy forces. A handful of memorable maps feature unique mechanics like raising walls or defensive fortifications, but most lack interesting design elements. The leader-targeting strategy proves overwhelmingly dominant, as defeating leaders causes their entire monster retinue to flee. While Zone of Control mechanics—preventing units from passing adjacent hexes occupied by enemies—theoretically enable defensive positioning, enemy AI rarely utilizes these tactics effectively, frequently sending leaders ahead of monster companions to be surrounded and eliminated.

Mission Mode: The Saving Grace

For players seeking genuine challenge, Mission Mode offers Brigandine Abyss’s saving grace. Unlike Story Mode’s six factions, Mission Mode unlocks all 24 factions of Meltitea, each with unique victory conditions. Some objectives remain conventional—conquering the entire map within 99 seasons or completing Event Battle series—but others introduce surprisingly creative restrictions. Certain factions must amass fortunes to pay debts, others collect specimens from every monster species, some restrict available class types or characters, while others impose strict season limits. Mission Mode forces engagement with core systems in genuinely fresh ways, demanding bespoke strategies that feel completely unlike Story Mode’s monotony. Players who enjoy self-imposed challenges in Civilization or Romance of the Three Kingdoms will find hours of remixed content straining their strategic capabilities.

Prior Brigandine titles allowed unit revival but made resurrection items extremely rare, ensuring every tactical decision carried significant weight. Brigandine Abyss completely neuters these consequences by offering plentiful revival items through shops, eliminating meaningful risk during combat. This accessibility-focused change, combined with weak enemy AI, transforms most battles into routine exercises rather than tense tactical puzzles. The best strategy RPGs demand consistent mental engagement throughout each encounter, but Brigandine Abyss frequently devolved into going through motions during the dozens of identical Invasion Phase battles separating more interesting Event Battles.

In attempting to bridge gaps between diehard franchise fans and newcomers unfamiliar with grand strategy setups, Brigandine Abyss ultimately waters down elements that made it unique. A compelling strategic experience exists here, particularly within Mission Mode, but Story Mode becomes so beset by mechanical repetition and narrative cliché that exploring remaining story paths holds little appeal. Mission Mode provides steep, engaging challenges but lacks the narrative justification and measured progression loops that make strategy RPGs resonate emotionally. As a grand strategy sandbox emphasizing combat, there is enjoyment to be found, but Brigandine Abyss fails to marry these gameplay styles into a truly satisfying hybrid experience worthy of its cult classic heritage.

Expert Opinion: Brigandine Abyss represents a cautionary tale in franchise evolution—attempting accessibility improvements while simultaneously losing the mechanical depth that attracted devoted fans initially. The series would benefit from either fully committing to grand strategy complexity or reimagining itself entirely, rather than occupying an uncomfortable middle ground. Future entries should prioritize dynamic narrative integration that responds to player conquests and invest in AI improvements that make tactical decisions genuinely consequential.

More From Author